I think it's interesting that struts got more votes than JSF. Knowing the amount of code it takes to do anything in JSF I might tend to agree. But still, struts?
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 10:50 -0800, Konstantin Ignatyev wrote: > Just want to share: > last night here at Seattle Java User group we had a round table discussion > where people were presenting WEB UI frameworks they use and tried to > highlight things they love about them. There were many: Millstone, > Barracuda, echo2, JSF, Struts, Tapestry, Tiles/Sitemesh, DWR, RubyOnRails > Every presenter had about 6-8 minutes for a “sales pitch” and at the end > people answered the question: > If you were a king and decide what framework to use for next project, which > framework will you use? (People voted once only for just one framework) > > Tapestry – 15; > Struts – 5; > JSF – 3; > The rest got zero or 1 votes; > I could attribute Tapestry's warm reception to my presenter skills :) > but in reality it is the Howard's hard work and Tapestry community make the > framework so appealing to developers. > I ask everybody to speak about Tapestry more frequently on occasions and > this way we all will benefit from wider Tapestry adoption. > > > Konstantin Ignatyev -- Dan Adams Software Engineer Interactive Factory --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
