My removing the landuse tags from the Utah national forest objects is part of the process of achieving that consensus, is the way I see it. It's a simple change that could easily be reverted, and I think it helps the discussion to actually see the outcome of the change. Apologies for posting my last message using my openstreetmap.us address by the way, I manage to mess up my from: field from time to time. These are my own personal views and do not represent those of the US Chapter board - not that they would want to meddle in tagging discussions anyway.
Martijn Martijn van Exel skype: mvexel On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Tod Fitch <[email protected]> wrote: > I have seen lots of “bike shedding” on this and I am of the opinion that > landuse=forest should be removed from the US national forest boundary > relations. But I was unaware that a consensus had been achieved. If it has, > perhaps the wiki page at > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_Forest_Service_Data#National_Forest_Boundaries > can be brought into conformance with that consensus. > > On Aug 17, 2015, at 7:44 AM, Martijn van Exel <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I removed the landuse=forest from the national forest relations in Utah: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33392465. > > The map will look very white :( but at least it's not wrong anymore. > > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
