On Monday 17 August 2015, Martijn van Exel wrote: > I removed the landuse=forest from the national forest relations in > Utah: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33392465.
To find further occurances you can use: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/aZs You will also see there that many national forests are mapped as multiple separate areas each with tags and the same name - like http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2658152 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30268500 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30268493 It would be a good idea to consolidate those into one multipolygon relation so someone searching for a national forest for example will find the whole forest and not only the largest subarea. > The map will look very white :( but at least it's not wrong anymore. It will also encourage mapping of actual forested areas as well as other vegetation and natural features. -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
