On 21/02/2023 14:34, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
Feb 21, 2023, 15:24 by zeev.stad...@gmail.com:
1. As far as non-emergency routing, the "locked" tag should be
ignored.
2. A "locked=no" tag indicates that a legal access restriction is
not enforced by a lock and therefore could be overcome in case
of an emergency.
3. A "locked=yes" tag indicates that the legal access restriction
is enforced by a lock and therefore cannot be overcome in case
of an emergency.
I'd actually suggest that "locked=yes" just means "there is a lock". It
_might_ be there to enforce a restriction, or it might be an "illegal
lock". There are unfortunately some examples of the latter on rights of
way in England, Wales and especially Scotland.
This is not the interpretation of other people, as seen in a
discussion on a GraphHopper routing issue
https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/2757#issuecomment-1434806229
There you could also find a picture of such a barrier.
Please help us resolve the differences
That is better mapped by mapping path around barrier, at least in my
opinion.
Agreed - if you can walk around a locked gate, ensure that the OSM data
reflects that.
Best Regards,
Andy
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
