Nov 6, 2022, 01:11 by robin.bu...@gmx.de:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging" tagging@openstreetmap.org – 6. November 2022
> 00:24
>
>
>>
>> 1) there was no consensus even among people who voted in that old proposal
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> And what do you say to the result of 41 : 9 ? That is not a "consensus"?
>
>
Consensus has a clear meaning, and is far stronger than "only small part is
opposed".
Consensus was not reached in this case.
> Then why is healtcare also considered approved? Ah well, maybe because it is
> an approved proposal and therefore the "consensus" for OSM.
>
You can get proposal approved without it being a consensus position.
Also, consensus can change over time.
-------------------------------------------------------
I am dubious about claim that we need to deprecate more heavily used things
to make things more attractive to programmers and data consumers.
"something that you are using just got deprecated" is a guaranteed way to annoy
any programmer. Works well also for manager in a large company.
Also, I will link
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mateusz%20Konieczny/diary/398555
again.
Titled "Deprecated or duplicate tagging schemes in use are not critical issues"
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
