Vào lúc 18:16 2022-11-04, Martin Koppenhoefer đã viết:

On 4 Nov 2022, at 13:17, Marc_marc <marc_m...@mailo.com> wrote:

our "sister" project (wikipedia) has no problem defining what is an anecdote and what is 
"relevance from a historic viewpoint",
I don't see why we should have any issue doing it.


Mappers are working fundamentally different from wikipedia authors, because 
they are recording observations, first hand study, while wikipedia work means 
working with sources. Original research is explicitly frowned upon in wikipedia 
while it is at the basis of mapping. We do not have relevance criteria as a 
hurdle for inclusion of things, we only require them to exist. I do not say 
relevance does not exist, but it is less important for our mapping. We are 
creating “categories” of things by applying tags, and I do not believe it would 
be helpful to have different main categories for the same thing, depending on 
its historic relevance, hence I do not believe redefining the “historic” key in 
this direction would be helpful for the project.

I think this point would be every bit as applicable to our other sister project, OpenHistoricalMap, which works with both published sources (for the past) and observations (for the present). So far, OHM has hewn to OSM's tagging schemes, including the historic=* tags that are almost always anachronistic.

For example, most historic=manor weren't historic the moment they were completed. A historic=battlefield may not have been historic until the tide turned in a larger campaign. I would expect historic=citywalls to be less common in OHM than barrier=city_wall.

Both historic=* and heritage=* make a value judgment, but heritage designations are made by historical societies and government agencies. Who are we to make a similar designation as mappers?

Maybe both OSM and OHM could live with historic=* being a misnomer as (wait for it) a historical accident, but if someone is coining a tag and they're choosing between historic=* and another suitable key, I'd advise them to pick the other key.

--
m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us



_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to