There are area hazards around, like shooting ranges, and high electric
fields around radio transmitters, and more likely others.

I am not insisting on using the hazard key - I only noted similarities.

On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 17:33, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Another argument against use of hazard=* for rapids is that the hazard key
> has been used almost always with highway=* features, not waterways.
>
> Also, currently waterfalls (which can be considered very large and steep
> rapids!) are tagged waterway=waterfall on a node. Other waterway barriers
> are also tagged this way, e.g. waterway=dam and waterway=weir. Tagging
> waterway=rapids on a node allows rapids to be tagged like other waterway
> barriers to travel and similar to waterfalls.
>
> -- Joseph Eisenberg
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 2:36 AM Tomas Straupis <tomasstrau...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> 2020-12-17, kt, 00:02 ael via Tagging rašė:
>> > This is slightly off-topic in that I am picking up on the
>> > hazard tag rather than rapids. I see no objection to adding
>> hazard=rapids
>> > although that might be redundant unless there exist rapids that are
>> > not hazardous. I suppose shallow rapids might qualify.
>>
>>   Note that rapid does not necessarily have to be interpreted as
>> hazard. If prominent on the ground it can be one of orienting points
>> (with bridges, settlements, intakes etc.) - to cover distance
>> covered/remaining. We have a lot of "small rapids" which can be easily
>> passed with no risk even with babies and they're still marked for
>> orienting purposes.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to