On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 10:22:44PM +0100, Volker Schmidt wrote: > I see this subject directly related to the "hazard" discussion in the sense > that I suggested to clearly define the difference between signposted > hazards/dangers/warnings and un-signed such situations that are observable > on the ground, and therefore are subject also to personal judgement. With > other words, beyond the question of how to map it, there is also the > question of what is a rapid or any other hazard.
I strongly agree. I was planning to vote against the current hazard proposal on exactly these grounds. There are clear hazards that are not necessarily signed. I don't see why we need two different tags. This is slightly off-topic in that I am picking up on the hazard tag rather than rapids. I see no objection to adding hazard=rapids although that might be redundant unless there exist rapids that are not hazardous. I suppose shallow rapids might qualify. ael _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
