2020-12-17, kt, 00:02 ael via Tagging rašė: > This is slightly off-topic in that I am picking up on the > hazard tag rather than rapids. I see no objection to adding hazard=rapids > although that might be redundant unless there exist rapids that are > not hazardous. I suppose shallow rapids might qualify.
Note that rapid does not necessarily have to be interpreted as hazard. If prominent on the ground it can be one of orienting points (with bridges, settlements, intakes etc.) - to cover distance covered/remaining. We have a lot of "small rapids" which can be easily passed with no risk even with babies and they're still marked for orienting purposes. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
