> 13 dec. 2020 kl. 15:21 skrev Paul Allen <[email protected]>:
> 
>  I'm probably misunderstanding this, but torp doesn't seem to be a type of
> building.  The tag building=torp says that this building IS a torp (as
> opposed to a house, or a shop, or a garage, or a shed, or a barn).
> If you feel a need to indicate that a building was once part of a torp,
> building=torp isn't the way to do it.
> 

You’re right; I was extremely sloppy with terminology there. A torp is (or 
rather was) a small farm, usually either part of a bigger farm and farmed by a 
tenant, paying rent to the bigger farm in the form of work, or farmed by a 
soldier (paying rent by, well, being a soldier). Today, most of them are either 
completely gone or used as summer houses, very probably not with the original 
building.

I suppose what I wanted to say was:

* place=locality is used about all sorts of things, both inhabited and 
uninhabited, and is pretty much useless.

* There are many places around Sweden (and probably the rest of the world as 
well!) where there is just forest (or fields) today, that have a name because 
they were, at some time, a torp (or some other kind of settlement). To render 
these in ”swedish topo-map style” (i.e, italics), some sort of tagging is 
needed to say ”this place has a name because it used to be a 
farm/torp/whatever, but today there is nothing here”. (I suppose some would 
argue that these should not be in OSM at all, because they are very hard to 
verify on the ground).

* There are also isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages, suburbs and airport car 
parks (comparing old and present-day maps around Stockholm-Arlanda airport is 
quite fun) whose names refer to long-gone torps, but those can be tagged 
according to their present-day usage.

And I’d like to apologize to Anders for derailing this thread by bringing up 
the subject at all! It was intended as an illustration of the uselessness of 
locality, but I got a bit carried away. Trying to render consistent maps from 
inconsistent OSM data does that to you. =)

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to