I asked about this ~1½ years ago too ( https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-February/thread.html#43244 ). In the end I thought `sleepable:physical=yes/no` is an accurate tag, and fits the OSM philosophy well (* https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-February/043270.html ) (though I've only added <10 tags for that https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/sleepable%3Aphysical )
I created a simple pic4review misson, which you can duplicate if you want. ( https://pic4review.pavie.info/#/mission/1313 ). You could also suggest a StreetComplete quest There was some reddit threads: • https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/avbmsb/is_there_a_preferred_way_of_mapping_possible/ • https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/8rs7zf/how_to_map_antihomeless_bench/ On Sun, 23 Aug 2020, at 6:28 PM, Vucod via Tagging wrote: > Hello, > > 1) I wish to tag benches that were designed to avoid that someone lie > on it. There has been some related discussions in the past > (https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/avbmsb/is_there_a_preferred_way_of_mapping_possible/ > and > https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/8rs7zf/how_to_map_antihomeless_bench/ > ) > but with no conclusion. It is possible that it has retained people to > map that kind of objects. Today, there is nearly no such information in > OSM. Maybe it is because it is not its place? Nobody expressed that > clearly. > > So, I started to use the tag *lying_hindrance=yes* on some benches. In > case of doubts, this can be verified when doing surveys, by lying on > the bench. This could also be determined most of the time by looking at > a few things. The length of the bench, the presence of a slope, the > presence of separation between the seats of the bench, and by checking > if it is a standing bench. Note that length was refused as an official > key for bench and that the key for the separation doesn't exist > (armrest does not specifically concern the inner part of the bench). > The tag could be extended by specifying the hindrance type: armrest, > standing_bench, short_length, slope, ... > > What do you think about this tag? Do you have alternative ideas? > > 2) Also, I wish to map something else related to hostile architecture > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostile_architecture>. I wish to map > devices that are placed near the entrance of shops to prevent people to > sit there (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGdHfvsCP7A, > https://twitter.com/ArticuleE/status/1222197697333145603, > https://twitter.com/ArticuleE/status/1215931276944924672). I was going > to add a combination of tags on the building where the shop is located: > > sitting_hindrance=yes > sitting_hindrance:location=street_side > > It can also be verified quite easily. A general tag like > hostile_architecture={sitting_hindrance|lying_hindrance} would also be > quite useful for mappers to rapidly understand the purpose of these > tags. > > What do you think about it? > > Thanks for your time > > Vucod > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
