It is nicer to avoid contradictions, but I am not planning to work on this specific case.
If you want you may propose specific edit and post it here for review (or make it and discuss if someone disagrees). "Someone should write/expand it" is typically ignored. Aug 14, 2020, 20:35 by tagging@openstreetmap.org: > So, should this contradiction be eliminated from the wiki or not? > > > > Às 09:32 de 26/05/2020, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging escreveu: > >> Based on my experience it is usually better to write something, even >> not ideal and >> ask for a review. >> >> "Someone should write/expand it" is typically ignored. >> >> May 26, 2020, 10:58 by >> vosc...@gmail.com>> : >> >>> Please come back to my original question: >>> I would like to >>> eliminate the contradiction in the wiki. What wording do you >>> propose? >>> >>> On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 10:23, Jean-Marc Liotier <>>> >>> j...@liotier.org>>> > wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/26/20 5:44 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> It can't hurt to specify oneway=yes. I have >>>>>> noticed that the JOSM style >>>>>> that shows lane counts and lane use will >>>>>> sometimes not show ways >>>>>> properly if oneway=yes isn't there, but that's >>>>>> probably a bug in the >>>>>> style more than an indictment of implying >>>>>> oneway=yes. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm on the side of "team tag explicitly" on this. If >>>>> anything, it gives validators more to work with if you >>>>> start doing something weird. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Isn't that what oneway=no is for ? >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Tagging mailing list >>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________Tagging mailing list>> >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
