Please come back to my original question: *I would like to eliminate the contradiction in the wiki. What wording do you propose?*
On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 10:23, Jean-Marc Liotier <j...@liotier.org> wrote: > On 5/26/20 5:44 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > It can't hurt to specify oneway=yes. I have noticed that the JOSM style >> that shows lane counts and lane use will sometimes not show ways >> properly if oneway=yes isn't there, but that's probably a bug in the >> style more than an indictment of implying oneway=yes. >> > > I'm on the side of "team tag explicitly" on this. If anything, it gives > validators more to work with if you start doing something weird. > > Isn't that what oneway=no is for ? > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
