Based on my experience it is usually better to write something, even not ideal and ask for a review.
"Someone should write/expand it" is typically ignored. May 26, 2020, 10:58 by vosc...@gmail.com: > Please come back to my original question: > I would like to eliminate the > contradiction in the wiki. What wording do you propose? > > On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 10:23, Jean-Marc Liotier <> j...@liotier.org> > wrote: > >> On 5/26/20 5:44 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> It can't hurt to specify oneway=yes. I have noticed that the >>>> JOSM style >>>> that shows lane counts and lane use will sometimes not show >>>> ways >>>> properly if oneway=yes isn't there, but that's probably a >>>> bug in the >>>> style more than an indictment of implying oneway=yes. >>>> >>> >>> I'm on the side of "team tag explicitly" on this. If anything, it >>> gives validators more to work with if you start doing something >>> weird. >>> >> >> Isn't that what oneway=no is for ? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
