It seems highly strange that you wouldn't even be allowed to carry/push your bike, are you sure that was what it meant? Do you have a picture of the sign?
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020, 22:50 Allroads, <allroadswo...@gmail.com> wrote: > There lots of forest roads/path, where the bicycle/pushed carried is > prohibited. Mostly, private owned land with a access_sign. > “the bicycle” “transportation vehicle” is prohibited. > > Because, navigation programs do not us bicycle=no, as a hard no, there is > the need for a extra value. > bicycle=explicit_no, means “the vehicle” is prohibited. > > Why a value? > We need a one value, otherwise a lot of more keys, which makes it things > complicated. At the end it means for all explicit no! > bicycle_pushed=no > motorcycle_pushed=no > horse_pushed=no ;-) > moped_pushed=no > mofa_pushed=no > etc. > > Better one value, key=explicit_no > > What do you think? > > If we do not solve this problem, this stays forever. > > On the wiki page dismount, this bicycle_pushed is mentioned. > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Ddismount > For me a wrong advise. > The problem is wider for more transportation modes, even for other product > to carry around. > > Private access_sign rules, can go much further then traffic_sign. In what > is prohibited. > What the owner think and write down on the sign is valid. > The skateboard is prohibited, means you can not carry a skateboard around > with you. > skateboard=explicit_no > > I need this value to do it correctly. Where the bicycle is no allowed. Or > a other value meaning the same. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
