>
> And there is (c) a non-urban trail with legal access for bicycles but in
> practice only usable with a mountain bike but lacking a MTB scale tag as
> the hiker, like me, who mapped it has no clue what MTB scale to put on it.
>

This is likely the default way of interpreting highway=path with no
additional tags.

I just commented on a new mapper using highway=footway for the above
example. The response I got was that it should probably be footway, as the
path was leading to stairs and as such "not accessible" by bicycle and
therefore a footpath. With no additional tag I would interpret
highway=footway as an urban path with some kind of smooth surface, which
was not the case here and I think it should be highway=path and possible
bicycle=no & mtb=no.

*I still think the distinction needs to be much more clear between
path|footway|cycleway for all the cases when no additional tag is being
used. *Should a footway be used for a natural forest path where it's
unlikely that MTB:s will go? No. But the wiki description leaves the door
open.

Fine with JOSM messing up combined foot- and cycleways (I tried to look,
but couldn't find an issue tracker to discuss that misbehaviour with the
JOSM developers). In JOSM I get a warning if I add a combined foot- and
cycleway without adding a segregated tag. *If highway=path with no surface
tag would get the same warning in both JOSM and iD, we'd be getting at
least somewhere.*

Good that this discussion has lead to some improvement of the description
of sac_scale. As has been mentioned, *sac_scale and mtb:scale need values
for "no"* as well, to actively say that "although this is a path, it
doesn't qualify for a hiking path or an mtb singletrail". *And the
description for those tags would need to emphasize when not to use the tag,
or use the "no" value. Otherwise sac_scale=hiking makes no distinction
whatsoever between a paved path and a hiking path that may be quite
technical.*

/Daniel







>
>

> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to