On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 12:08:22 +0200 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Am Do., 30. Apr. 2020 um 11:59 Uhr schrieb Warin > <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > > > On 30/4/20 7:29 pm, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > > > > > > Am Do., 30. Apr. 2020 um 11:18 Uhr schrieb Jean-Marc Liotier < > > j...@liotier.org>: > > > >> The concept they are closest to is "plaza" > >> (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plaza) - which, by the way, does > >> not seem to have currency in Openstreetmap. > > > > > > > > place=square > > > > Needs to have a name, many of these have no names. > > > > > if these are significant open areas that are used for recreation and > to meet each other, it seems improbable that they do not have names. > Can you back your claim with real world examples? In most of the world, things only get names when there's some ambiguity about which one is being referred to. Real-world example from North America: when I was growing up, if someone came by and told me there was a hockey game forming, there was no need to specify where. Everyone knew that the neighborhood kids used a certain stretch of side road as their hockey field. -- Mark _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
