On 09/12/19 10:44, Peter Elderson wrote:
Ok, just asking to make sure.
As an overview most hiking things are on
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking
Could you envision a node passed by two hikes, and being a checkpoint
for the one and nothing special for the other?
Yes.
Would a checkpoint need to be a node of a way in the relation?
If it only relates only to that relation then quite possibly.
If it is a required activity for that route then I would think so. This
would link it to the operator, route name etc, possibly minimising the
work of mappers and reducing errors?
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op ma 9 dec. 2019 om 00:16 schreef Kevin Kenny
<kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com <mailto:kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com>>:
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 6:10 PM Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com
<mailto:pelder...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Is a checkpoint a feature in itself?
Of course it is. A way segment is also a feature in itself, which
doesn't mean that it can't or shouldn't be part of a route relation:
"When you're hiking this route, you'll need to sign in at these
points."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:checkpoint
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
