On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 10:30:37 +1100, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'd suggest making it clear that that table is currently for way > > members only - it doesn't mention node members (start, end, marker, > > etc.). This may be deliberate, or you just haven't expanded it yet, > > but I'd definitely mention node members. > > For nodes .. think the roles of ways should be done first, but some > thoughts for later proposal/s. > > Are they necessary? >
In my limited experience mapping hiking routes, I have not yet come across any real use for nodes in hiking relations, but I'm curious if other people have good uses. As far as I know, there is also not much documented in the wiki on the topic of nodes in hiking/cycling relations. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
