Distinction between landline and mobile is technical, and often not clear. You cannot always distinguish mobile numbers form landline numbers by their numbering scheme. In the US here is no distinction as far as I am aware anyway. Here in Italy you may dial a number that looks like a landline but is in reality a mobile number. I would very much prefer a list of numbers, and not have to do tricks like phone_1, phone_2 ... but also not to have to specify if a number is mobile or landline.
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 at 16:12, websi...@posteo.de <websi...@posteo.de> wrote: > As a heavy user of the contact:*=* scheme I do not see an advantage to > mark it as deprecated. > > At least not as long as we do not have a proper way to tag multiple > kinds of phone numbers and are dealing with non-sense like phone_2=*, > phone_3=* etc automatically generated by the iD editor. > > One frequent use case I run into is the distinction of landline phone > numbers and mobile phone numbers. The latter can be tagged by using > contact:mobile=* which is also properly used by data users like OsmAnd. > In my eyes even contact:website=* is not necessarily illogical as many > websites provide means to get in contact with the POI. > > All the best, > > highflyer74 > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
