Am 12.09.2019 um 23:24 schrieb Peter Elderson:
In NL node networks all node2node routes are route relations.
Then all the relations and the nodes are added to the network
relation, where the network:type (i.e. the setup/system/rules), the
network name, operator, website etc are tagged. Currently, the network
relation for node networks is used only for maintenance en checking
network integrity.
Oh, thank you for clarifying.
I think the network in Bremen is a preference route system.
Sounds about right.
Yours
Hubert87
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op do 12 sep. 2019 om 22:49 schreef Hubert87 via Tagging
<tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org>>:
To summarize:
- (highway) Use lcn=yes on the highway; (my Idea) maybe with some more
Information about the network like lcn:operator=*, lcn:ref=* or
similar.
- (route-relation) split up the network into smaller relations going
from guidepost to guidepost. Seems very complicated, also to query/get
the entire network.
- (network-relation) get a new value for network:type=* , maybe
guidepost_network.
I still have a slight preference toward the network-relation. It seems
very similar to the node-network from NL and imho should be tagged
comparably.
However, most import to me is to keep the information about the
network
character somehow. A simple lcn=yes won't do that.
Yours
Hubert87
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
