In NL node networks all node2node routes are route relations. Then all the relations and the nodes are added to the network relation, where the network:type (i.e. the setup/system/rules), the network name, operator, website etc are tagged. Currently, the network relation for node networks is used only for maintenance en checking network integrity.
I think the network in Bremen is a preference route system. Vr gr Peter Elderson Op do 12 sep. 2019 om 22:49 schreef Hubert87 via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org>: > To summarize: > - (highway) Use lcn=yes on the highway; (my Idea) maybe with some more > Information about the network like lcn:operator=*, lcn:ref=* or similar. > - (route-relation) split up the network into smaller relations going > from guidepost to guidepost. Seems very complicated, also to query/get > the entire network. > - (network-relation) get a new value for network:type=* , maybe > guidepost_network. > > I still have a slight preference toward the network-relation. It seems > very similar to the node-network from NL and imho should be tagged > comparably. > > However, most import to me is to keep the information about the network > character somehow. A simple lcn=yes won't do that. > > Yours > Hubert87 > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
