On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 17:47, François Lacombe <fl.infosrese...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > As both the topic of the proposal and the IP norm are approximately at the > same semantic distance of "protection class" term, > Reasonable point. that's why I recommend to move to "environment_protection=*" (or something > like this) to be more focused on what is actually described. > But IP ratings are regarded as environmental protection ratings. So that has the same problem. "Environmental protection" can mean "protecting the environment" or "protecting things from the environment." IP stands for International Protection > Nope, Ingress Protection. It's an international standard, though. Even if protection class is a misnomer, I find risky to use it as this for > a completely different topic, that's my 2 cts.All the best > If we can avoid confusion, we should. I'm not sure that this does. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
