Le mer. 28 août 2019 à 18:15, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> "Protection class" is something of a misnomer when it comes to IEC 60529, > since it specifies > a level of ingress protection (hence the "I" and "P" in the designation) > against water and > dust. It does, as a side-effect, have some bearing on the possibility of > contact of dangerous > parts by fingers, but that is largely incidental. And while you may have > seen it referred to > as "protection class" it seems more common to refer to it as "ingress > protection class." > Hi Paul, As both the topic of the proposal and the IP norm are approximately at the same semantic distance of "protection class" term, that's why I recommend to move to "environment_protection=*" (or something like this) to be more focused on what is actually described. IP stands for International Protection, which indeed consist in limiting ingress of foreign object or water in a given enclosure. Even if protection class is a misnomer, I find risky to use it as this for a completely different topic, that's my 2 cts. All the best François
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
