On 11/07/19 09:46, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 08:20, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com
<mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>> wrote:
With the above additional qualification to de facto, 'In use'
becomes a frequently used tag without any criticism.
The difference between the two is historical, before or after the
adoption of the approval process.
It distinguishes between those tags that could not have been
through the approval process and those that could but were not.
So how do we go with creating a page for a tag that is "in use" but
has apparently never been discussed?
Last week, I asked about a Christmas shop, thinking about tagging it
as shop=party, but it was pointed out that shop=christmas has actually
been used 14 times, but apparently has never been discussed anywhere?
14? I don't think that is a 'significant' number of uses.
I made a wiki page for netball, which had some ~1,000 uses when I made
the page. Now over 6,000 uses... I have not bothered with the status of
it .. IIRC left it unstated.
Considering the present state of 'status' I probably won't bother with it.
Does that make it "in use" / "de facto"?
Am I OK to just create a page for shop=christmas, so other people know
it exists, or should it go through the full RFC / voting procedure to
be "approved"?
Your choice.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
