On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 15:07, Jason wrote: > That was silly of me. It would be better to have > hitching_point=post|rail|loop|hook|yes. > And use hitching_point:for=dog|cat|horse with semicolon multiple values > permitted. > > [...] hitching_point:capacity, hitching_point:material etc can be added > later if really required.
This seems sensible. In this case, the tags should be added to a node from the building's outline, rather than to an amenity, shouldn't they? On 6/18/2019 3:07 PM, Jason wrote: > Why tie your dog to a hook for free when instead you could pay for a > private climate-controlled > doghouse on the sidewalk, complete with a smartphone app that locks the > door and shows you > the doghouse webcam? Huh. I didn't know that was a thing. Some cities have no facilities for dogs and others have too many. On 6/18/2019 3:07 PM, Jason wrote: > I wouldn't want to tag these as "hitching_point" because there's no hitch. > I might have been > inclined to shoehorn them into amenity=animal_boarding, but it since they > fill the same need > at the hitching points I wonder if there should be a tag that could apply > to both of these items. amenity=animal_boarding is meant for pet resorts with caretakers. I can't find a standard tag for doghouses... Maybe amenity=shelter or building=roof? I don't think they should share any tag as the only thing they have in common is that they're both intended for dogs to wait inside. -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Tagging-f5258744.html _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
