On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 01:01:20PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > 22 May 2019, 12:49 by f...@zz.de: > > > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:37:21PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > > >> > Again a footway between the house and a road will NOT help for > >> > car navigation because for cars a footway is NOT a routable > >> > part of the graph. > >> > > >> Car navigation may use footway data to select best dropoff point. > >> > >> In exactly the same way as you proposed with navaid relation, > >> but without adding subjective data. > >> > > > > Look at my school example - would still be broken. Yes - there is a > > footway - but not the original parking lot for the school. > > > > Different street. ~1km detour. No parking at the selected spot - Private > > property. > > > > You are trying to fix an algorithm with new assumptions which break in > > other aspects. You need to have a way to EXPLICITLY define a location > > where to navigate to. > > > I noticed no link to that case, but here routers should direct car to mapped > parking within school area (it is a public parking, right?).
Search for it - When i add a link i add a specific location - I did this
intentionally - Because with the search you map object -> specific
location and then you can query OSRM again for routing.
It is the official parking lot for the school. Its vis a vis to the
entrance.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
