On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:55:44PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > - Baumstraße 43a, Gütersloh, Germany > > It does not have a connection to Baumstraße but to > > Hermann-Vogelsang-Straße. > > > > It still will be routed through Baumstraße and the driveway to > > Baumstraße 45a > > > > IMHO unfixable without bending geometry > > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273023376 > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273023376> has no mapped entrance, > footway access, driveway. Fences are also unmapped.
Footway -> not for car
fences -> not in graph for navigation - not connected to graph-> purely
cosmetic object.
43a has no footway/driveway. The carport is directly at the side of the
road.
> I am not sure whatever we have smart routers, but here even human would fail
> due to lack of data.
>
> I added driveway based on aerial image but it is unlikely to be enough.
Where is it ? 43a does not have a driveway.
> > - Dalbker Straße 40a, Oerlinghausen, Germany
> > Dalbker Straße 44a, Oerlinghausen, Germany
> >
> Fences/hedges/whatever barrier is there is missing though
> really smart router (that is using footway at start and the end)
> would work correctly here.
>
> Have you checked whatever this improvement is suggested for routers with
> public
> bug trackers?
Okay - first you tell me - its solvable - then you tell me data is
missing, now you tell me the software is broken.
And there is a footway - its directly in front of the door. Still - you
will get routed to a differen street. The footway is NOT in the graph
for cars.
All objects you put into this argument do not have any influence on any
routing app/software mentioned in this thread before.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
