On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 09:13:14AM +0000, marc marc wrote: > Le 22.05.19 à 09:43, Florian Lohoff a écrit : > >> Can you give example of residential building with fully mapped roads, > >> footways and obstacles where well written router will fail? > > > > - Baumstraße 43a, Gütersloh, Germany > > you mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273023376 ? > it's a good example of missing datas. > no entrance, no way between the entrance and the public network. > please, there should be an example of a target where the current schema > are not enough, and not an example where the lack of data produce > a bad routing > > right now I feel that the relation type=navaids should be called > type=missingway
Again a footway between the house and a road will NOT help for
car navigation because for cars a footway is NOT a routable
part of the graph.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
