On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 11:47 AM Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> wrote:
> > 1 May 2019, 20:11 by cliff...@snowandsnow.us: > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:13 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > highway=footway wheelchair=yes ... would be in keeping with present > tagging of wheelchairs in OSM. ??? > > > wheelchair=yes doesn't capture the specific nature of the access_aisle. > Most any footway could be wheelchair=yes, only only areas designed for > unloading vans in a handicap parking space would have the tag > highway=footway+footway=access_aisle. > > This would allow van navigation right to a parking lot with an access > aisle. > > highway=footway wheelchair=designated may be worth considering > > Note that footway=access_aisle is not making clear that it is for > wheelchairs - > there are access aisles footway used for say unloading deliveries > Since the off loading area is called an access aisle, both in the US and UK [2], it seem to me that it would be an appropriate term to use. Would using highway=footway + footway=access_aisle + wheelchair=yes be a more acceptable tagging scheme? My concern is that just adding wheelchair=yes to a footway doesn't get at the requirement for the width of the access_aisle. [1] https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/buildings-and-sites/about-the-ada-standards/guide-to-the-ada-standards/chapter-5-parking [2] https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN01360/SN01360.pdf Best, Clifford -- @osm_washington osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
