On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 21:49, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 10:13, bkil <bkil.hu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Also, I was just considering whether we could unite related features >> like ticket booths/ticket check/vending/reception/information >> desk/check-in for various places like camp_site, hotel, motel, >> guest_house, school, office, mall, community_centre, sports_centre, >> events_venue, cinema, theatre, music_venue, nightclub, public >> transport, etc. >> > You could probably get away with classifying almost all of those as check_in, or maybe reception? For most of those venues, though,"reception" would be immediately inside the front door, so there wouldn't really be a need to show where it is.
An exception to that would be airports, where your ticket desk/s can be located almost anywhere, & you'd then also have to specify that this is the check-in for Airline A, that one is Airline B & so on Such merging may cause problems for (some) editors. If you can guarantee > that all > camp sites, hotels, motels, etc. can potentially have any of ticket > booths, vending, check in, > etc. then that's fine. E.g., if A could have any of X, Y or Z; B could > have any of X, Y or Z; > C can have any of X, Y or Z; etc. that isn't a problem. The editor's code > just handles it as > a list of X, Y and Z can apply to A, B and C > > What would be a problem is if A can only have X or Y; B can only have Y or > Z; and C can only have > X or Z. > Yes, we see this with some of the camping grounds we regularly go to. Some have offices / kiosks, where you check in on arrival; some have no check in requirements at all - you just arrive, pick a (unmarked) spot & set up; while others have to be booked online before you go. These could probably all be covered by check_in=yes / no / online_only, possibly together with a bookings=(url)? Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
