Volker Schmidt wrote: > "highway=path" implies "bicycle=yes" (in most jurisdictions) - see the > proposed Default-Access-Restriction for all countries
That's not a default that I feel enormously comfortable with. Whatever the wiki might say, "bare" highway=path (no other tags) is often used for little footpaths across city parks, sidewalks, and so on. cycle.travel errs on the side of caution and therefore doesn't route along highway=path unless there's an explicit access tag (or cycle route relation). Keeping bicycle=yes on bikes-allowed paths is useful information. If there's no bicycle= tag, yes, it could mean "bike access is implied by a default somewhere on the wiki" but it could also mean "this way is tagged incompletely". Deleting the tags would remove information and make it harder for routers to deliver real-world routing results. Please keep them. cheers Richard -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Tagging-f5258744.html _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
