On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 04:34, Mark Wagner <mark+...@carnildo.com> wrote:
> > How does this differ from aeroway=holding_position On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 06:04, Steven Estes <tapes...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tackle this a bit on the proposal page, which notes that holding_position > as currently formulated has two limitations. First, it's fairly broad. It > includes runway holding position markings, ILS critical holding position > markings, and interim holding position markings. Each of these markings is > used in a different way, and if I were to pull OSM data into a flight > simulation environment, the lack of distinction would be a huge problem. > How about modifying the existing tag to aeroway=holding_position:runway & aeroway=holding_position:intermediate (or similar arrangement); or alternatively aeroway:holding_position=runway / intermediate / anything else? Second, it's defined as a node rather than a way, but to be useful, the > full hold line (holding position marking) needs to annotated as it can't be > assumed that the line is either straight or perpendicular to the taxiway > centerline. If the second issue were the only problem, I'd be inclined to > just modify the existing tag to include ways (which appears to be used in > 20% of all cases anyway). > & do just that - change the wording to only map it as a way, not a node. It would appear, though, that they're currently not rendered (at least on the main map - is there an aero map, similar to Open Sea Map?), & I would think it fairly unlikely that they ever will be, so the distinction seem a bit moot? Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
