That actually looks pretty correct. It's a state highway and emergency vehicles are allowed to travel on it, so emergency=yes would be appropriate as well. ref=MI 185 would be better, since US references are XX YYY where XX is the state postal abbreviation (NOT SH, SR, K, M or whatever), but source:maxspeed=US:rural makes no sense at all (not just here, but in any context).
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:08 PM Sergio Manzi <[email protected]> wrote: > Venice situation is unusual but not unique and in other contexts different > tagging schemes have been used, not limited by the footway/pedestrian > alternative. > > As an example see how this road in Mackinac Island (*no motor vehicles > there...*) is tagged: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17874338 > > I've seen others too, but OTOMH I can't remember where, probably France > (*possibly > St. Malo...*) and/or Netherland, but by Googling for "pedestrian > town/city" and then checking on OSM, several pops up... > > Cheers, > > Sergio > > > On 2019-02-26 15:30, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > > Am Di., 26. Feb. 2019 um 14:40 Uhr schrieb Sergio Manzi <[email protected]>: > >> ... and not only cycleways: have a look here, where I live: >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/45.4364/12.3334 >> >> All are "highway=pedestrian", at the same level, but believe me: they are >> not! > > > > > Venice is a globally unique (or maybe almost unique) exception anyway, but > what we currently have there is the result of people reclassifying all the > footways as pedestrian roads, even if they are 50 cm wide. I have started > in the past several attempts to open a discussion on this, but it felt like > Don Quixote. See this as an example: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488627565/history I have surveyed it > myself, like many others, where I began to reclassify the very narrow > footpaths from pedestrian to footway, but I am not local and people destroy > the finer grained distinction of footway and pedestrian as soon as you add > them, I guess they do not want the red dots. It is unfortunate, because it > makes the Venice map much harder to read and less useful. If you are local, > please try to improve the situation, we do not need new tags, it would be > sufficient to apply the existing ones consistently rather than > indiscriminately. > > Cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
