Am 15.02.2019 um 17:09 schrieb Hubert87:
why not use foot=use_sidepath and/or sidewalk=no? In combination with
hw=primary/secondary, routers should be able to work out that that
route is a bad one.
Well, not all foot=no roads do have a sidepath. And anyway this
discussion is on whether the sidewalk=none and absence of a foot=*
warrants asking the user for it.
Also OT the city should declare that tunnel a motorroad, or put up
signs disallowing pedestrians and bicycle riders (and horses), like
opposite direction
<https://www.google.de/maps/@50.9401298,6.9532164,3a,75y,354.53h,97t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s-BF_bbPXwIa2GD2DghRJZQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656>
of your first example.
Also people using routers should apply common sense, too. Or stay at home.
Well, tell that the city. I could list you any number of cases in my
city where the officials have not signed everything we would like it in
OSM. We also need to apply common sense when mapping.
Tobias W
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
