" Maybe I should eschew obfuscation." +1
LOL. We have enough problems with English here - no need to add Latin to our already strained conversations. I like the idea of the "informal" category but isn't that more or less the same as "proposed"? IMO, the main difficulty with keeping the Wiki updated is that editing it is tricky. I see grammatical errors all the time, for example, but don't want to get into a big conversation about any changes I make so I often just ignore them. And adding a proposal is simply too much work when I have so many other things I want to add to the map. I guess that's due to my own shortcomings. But then again, I imagine that issue keeps many mappers besides me from altering or adding things to it. Dave On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 6:11 PM Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 10:52, Markus <selfishseaho...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Perhaps it would help though, if the status on the wiki page were more >> clear and prominent – maybe a different page colour and a status of >> 'informal' instead of 'in use' for those non-standard tags. >> > > Just to get into the spirit of things. };-) > > How about "impromptu" or "extempore" or "ad hoc" instead of informal? > When more widely > used we could change the status to "de facto." > > Maybe I should eschew obfuscation. > > -- > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
