On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 05:49, Markus <selfishseaho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've updated the proposal [1], > Good work, Markus A couple of thoughts ... Both natural=cape and natural=peninsula can be part of a natural=peninsula , comes out a bit awkwardly. Maybe just leave it as "A n=c can be part of a n=p", but a n=p cannot be part of a n=c"? > Regarding areas with fuzzy boundaries, I'd be inclined to do what other mappers have already done in those examples I posted the other day - follow the (verifiable) coastline, then just draw an arbitrary straight line across the base of the area. >From my reading, a peninsula / cape / headland / spit etc doesn't actually have a base or inland border - it is just the name given to that bit of land sticking out into the sea, so it would seem to only be OSM that is worried about where it starts. Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
