W dniu 29.11.2018 o 11:38, Martin Koppenhoefer pisze: > I am also not sure any more whether we should put all kinds of > protected areas in the same bucket, maybe there could already be a > first class distinction between natural protection, resource > protection and social protection.
I was trying to use this in my first approach to protected areas, but I have found that only protection_level numbers were standardized. Others are (mostly) human readable mess, for example: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=protection_title#values I would love to just render "nature-protected-area" (because this is the abstraction level I need), but in practice I had to define a list: tags->'protect_class' IN ('1','1a','1b','2','3','4','5','6','7','97','98','99') It's perfectly usable, but just not elegant and not human readable. -- "Excuse me, I have some growing up to do" [P. Gabriel]
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
