The whole thing seems pretty shaky to me. Op ma 26 nov. 2018 om 11:46 schreef Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com>:
> On 26/11/2018 08:35, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> On 23. Nov 2018, at 17:33, Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> We should be therefore able to repurpose the roles in a type=boundary > relation to store information about claimed, "de facto", and "de jure" > borders > > > > can you give a definition for de jure? > > Which law applies? > > > Notwithstanding that I don't think we can repurpose roles for this, as > already mentioned, I think you need to look at actual examples rather > talk in the abstract. > > To take Western Sahara as an example, > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_status_of_Western_Sahara#United_Nations > etc. describes the international political situation. What would you > say was the "de jure" border there and on what basis? According to > MINURSO https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/mission/minurso they are > "preparing for a choice", rather than directly trying to establish an > independent Western Sahara. > > Maybe part of the "de jure" list could come from those places in > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_list_of_Non-Self-Governing_Territories#Current_entries > (but excluding those for which there is no other claimant) would help? > That names "Western Sahara", although it doesn't define its borders here. > > Best Regards, > > Andy > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Vr gr Peter Elderson
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
