On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 16:57, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I can understand de facto and claimed, but I find de jure hard. Which law do > you apply? There is international law, customary international law ok, but if > the country doesn’t consent to certain ideas, e.g. doesn’t recognize the ICJ, > or has a different idea of customary international law? There are > international treaties, but they might contradict themselves, be disputed by > one of the parties, not be ratified by some few countries but by the vast > majority, etc. Somehow we will have to judge ourselves or decide which > authority we recognize (e.g. UN/ICJ).
This is why i used the roles 'undisputed', 'controlled' and 'claimed' in my draft [1]. Undisputed seems to be less problematic than de jure, but we still would have to define where we draw the line. [1]: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-November/040905.html Regards Markus _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
