On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 08:46, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > But look at what you're trying to achieve with special values meaning > disputed. So 2.5 (or -2) is the > same as 2 but disputed, 3.5 (or -3) is the same as 3 but disputed. It's > cleaner for code in the > renderer and for code in editors (and wetware in humans) to just have > admin_level:disputed=yes (or some such) rather than give special meanings > to special values > of a number. >
Fair enough thanks Paul. I won't even pretend to know anything about programming, coding & so on, so I certainly won't argue with you! I'd just had a thought about Marc's question earlier ^ as to "how" to tag it & thought that may have worked? And that's assuming a disputed flag doesn't cause more problems than it > solves: "No, that border > isn't disputed, we're absolutely certain it's right." says one of the > countries involved. So now we > need a flag pointing out that one country disputes that it's a disputed > border... > You're probably quite right there as well :-( Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
