Le 20. 06. 18 à 17:44, Jo a écrit : > Actually I have started to remove public_transport=platform from WAYS > with highway=platform and railway=platform. As far as I am concerned > public_transport=platform goes on NODES
sorry I didn't understand why (or maybe yes I prefer to not understand) Zverik's propal that you clone to request that public_transport=platform as way should be downgraded to a node-only HAS FAILED ! So if another mapper extend the node to better match the geometry of the plateform, why are you revert it ? yes wiki is ambigous. but for almost (?) all objects the extend from a node into a more precise geometry has always been considered an improvement, not a mistkae that need to be fixed. So the next contributor will probably add the PTv2 tags you deleted. > Removing those tags from ways comes from the objection of some people > that there would be both a way and a platform with the > public_transport=platform tag. I remember this talk about that on tranport (french-speaking transit) mailing when it became apparent that duplicate objects were so common in France that they affected stats at a regional scale. This resulted in a collective work to add missing PTv2 tags, many contributors spent many hours for that and fix a lot of mistake. Currently the region of french capital is nearly 100% PTv2 and at the country scale in france, there is almost no highway=plateform tag left that does not also have its PTv2 equivalent. Of course one stop in one direction should have : - only one plateform per "passenger waiting area" (including all variant public_transport=platform highway=platform and railway=platform) and/or - one stop_position having one "passenger waiting area" mapped as a node + as a way + a MP like I already see, with tags randomly distributed or duplicated between these osm objects that represent the same thing, it is a mess.... and PTv1 tag should of course be put only on one of the same objets. If not, you make duplicate objet for the same feature... like currently. > In other words, the rendering of *=platform on WAYS is just fine as it is. of course that it is the continuation of Zverik's failed proposal. but check current pratice : the supremacy of public_transport=platform over highway=platform is even clearer if we take into account the duplicate tag 900k for public_transport=platform without (highway=platform or railway=platform) 84k highway=platform + public_transport=platform only 9k highway=platform without public_transport=platform the community has already twice rejected this unintelligible wish to have a PTv2custom with different rules totally useless depending on the transport mode. PTv2 consists precisely in making things more HOMOGENEOUS. So please reconsider your modifications and take into account that highway=plateform and public_tramsport=plateform are 2 tags for the same concept (a passenger waiting area for a public transport), even if the render support only the oldest and less common schema for *=platform Regards, Marc _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
