On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:50 PM, <osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au> wrote:
> > I find it's less than productive for finding solutions to problems the > > wiki is currently advising to leave unresolved (such as this), or > > ambiguous (like primary vs trunk vs motorway in the US). > > It doesn't tell you to leave the problem unsolved. It only tells you that > tagging the legal default if there is nothing on the ground is not the > correct solution to the problem. Right, something I really think is quite a weak point right now. Especially when even if it's not on the ground, at least in the US jurisdiction, works of the government are readily reproducible. What makes deriving the data from the legal code on a government website any different, from, say, tracing NAIP aerial imagery?
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
