sent from a phone
> On 6. Apr 2018, at 03:50, <osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au> > <osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au> wrote: > > It doesn't tell you to leave the problem unsolved. It only tells you that > tagging the legal default if there is nothing on the ground is not the > correct solution to the problem. defaults on areas are complicated because you can have an infinite number of them and while inheriting them in a routing db might be “easy” (unless they are contradicting), they are not directly visible on the elements they affect, hence troubleshooting could become a nightmare. We are already mapping “defaults” explicitly for example with maxspeed according to context. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
