W dniu 09.01.2018 o 21:45, Mateusz Konieczny pisze:
My interpretation is that:
amenity=water_point
amenity=drinking_water
mark place used to get water, synonymous for most purposes
- but amenity=water_point may be used also to supply large volume of
water.
I don't think they are synonymous - water point says nothing about
drinkability. I think it's too important feature in general (I mean
outside West countries and in the outdoor) to just guess it when we have
special tagging for it.
man_made=water_well
man_made=water_tap
These tags do not indicate that water is available but precisely
describe what kind of structure exists at a given place.
I would probably use water=no if I knew they don't provide the water,
but it's quite rare tag (183 uses). My general assumption would be
however that the water is there.
Similarly amenity=drinking_water may also appear on objects
that are neither taps nor wells - like fountains or drinkable
mountainous stream in place where it is easy for tourists to get water
or many other object (I am unable to find image now but I encountered
mountainous stream with wooden construction that made refilling
bottles easy, with information board that water is drinkable).
Thanks, that's interesting example where this tag could be used alone,
probably.
I would say that amenity=drinking_water is a general source of the high
quality water and it would be good to make it more specific if possible
- adding tap, well and pump tags would be nice.
Similar with amenity=water_point - it's also general, but without
claiming anything about drinkability. Adding device type would be nice too.
--
"My method is uncertain/ It's a mess but it's working" [F. Apple]
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
