2017-10-15 15:14 GMT+02:00 Dave Swarthout <daveswarth...@gmail.com>: > I agree that tagging the entire lease area as landuse=industrial is not > correct. Part of the reason for posting is that I'm looking for alternative > ways to tag the large lease areas. Is there a boundary tag that someone can > suggest? > > Also, someone suggested tagging the wellsite with man_made=petroleum_well. > This tag is meant to be for nodes representing a single well. The wellsites > in alaska can contain dozens of individual well heads so that tag is not > appropriate. >
Map each well head can be interesting even if boring :) Areas may be drawn over fences surrounding heads groups. But if we map only areas, we are lacking information about how each well was installed, are they all the same depth, same pressure, and so on... Mapping each head would be simpler for tagging : fenced areas with barrier=fence + landuse=industrial well heads with man_made=petroleum_well (+substance=oil or +substance=gas ?) instead of area mapping only with many information actually related to wells on the polygon. Regarding my last mail, using oil=well would be pretty restrictive since many substances can be extracted from such wells. man_made key would be good. Can you provide coordinates of such areas please ? > > I have tagged the pipelines linking the wellsites with the processing > facilities as follows > > man_made=pipeline > location=overground or underground > substance=oil > operator=ConocoPhillips > Sounds ok to me François
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
