On 17-Aug-17 07:17 PM, Viking wrote:
My point is suction points and fire hydrant are different but compatible
things, as follow :
emergency=suction_point is a prefered place where to pump water in a river
emergency=fire_hydrant
is a kind of device which may or not be present in places like suction points
but in a large amount of other places.
This will be convenient because anyone looking for fire_hydrant will know what
does it look like and if there are
connectors or not And anyone looking for suction_points will know if he/she
have to bring appropriate stuff to get water.
This would be great to find a consensus on this point as to make the fire
hydrant proposal better :)
All the best
François
We need to know if the common accepted definition of suction point is this:
Suction points aren't devices like hydrants but are preferred places to pump
water from a not pressurized water source (river, pond, well).
Hydrant is an equipment/device and suction point is a place where you may or
not find a hydrant.
In this case the hydrant will be tagged emergency=fire_hydrant +
fire_hydrant:pressure=0.
Does the community agree?
In Australia these 'suction points' are called 'Static Water Supply'
- swimming pools, rain water tanks even air conditioning water cooling systems
(if large enough) are used.
See https://www.fire.nsw.gov.au/page.php?id=319
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
