sent from a phone
> On 15. Jun 2017, at 13:35, mbranco2 <mbran...@gmail.com> wrote: > > These toponyms are not strictly related to the (few) dispersed houses, but > also to the surrounding woods, meadows, fields, etc if the toponyms are not related to a settlement or part of it, locality is fine as value for place. Still I'm sure there are these kind of dispersed settlements consisting of several houses with a common settlement name that would not be nicely classified as hamlets, so a new place value would make sense (IMHO). cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
