On 05/31/2017 04:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > personally, I don't think "unsigned_ref" is a good tag, as it still > refers to a "ref", so I would put a "ref" tag and if you want another > tag that says the ref is not signed (e.g. ref=PA 235 unsigned_ref=yes, > but admittedly, according to taginfo this is not how it is done), but it > might be discutable and if you'd really want to emphasize that there are > no signs, it would seem a good way to do it. And then you have situations such as US 90 through Houston where it is routed onto I-610 and I-10 but not signed. US 90 comes out as a signed route near Katy (going west) and east of I-610 as a freeway (going east). I-10 and I-610 are the signed routes, but US 90 is still there. I don't see an easy way to tag the unsigned status of US 90 and AFAIK it is just tagged in ref=* like it was signed.
-- Shawn K. Quinn <skqu...@rushpost.com> http://www.rantroulette.com http://www.skqrecordquest.com _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
