How are unsigned segments of signed routes supposed to be mapped relation-wise? For example, PA 235 in Perry County, PA has a short unsigned concurrency with PA 17 going down into Liverpool, where both routes end at US 11/15. However, 235 signage stops where it first intersects PA 17. Obviously the segment of 17 should be given the "unsigned_ref=PA 235" tag, but what about the relation? Routing software that relies on relations would probably assume 235 is signed here, so what's the proper way to deal with this? Create a separate relation for the unsigned portion? Just don't add the PA 235 relation to 17 at all?
--Albert
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
